THE DOMINANCE OF CREDIT MECHANISMS IN SHARIA TRADING AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PRINCIPLE OF TRANSACTIONAL JUSTICE

Authors

  • Cut Dewi Rahma Pascasarjana UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65802/mukhtasab.v2i1.118

Keywords:

Islamic sales; credit mechanisms; transactional justice; Islamic economics

Abstract

The increasing dominance of credit-based mechanisms in contemporary Islamic sales has reshaped the structure and orientation of Sharīʿah-compliant commercial practices. While credit transactions are normatively permissible within Islamic law, their extensive use raises critical questions regarding the realization of transactional justice, which constitutes a fundamental principle of Islamic economics. This study examines the implications of the dominance of credit mechanisms in Islamic sales and evaluates their consistency with the ethical foundations of justice, balance, and mutual benefit embedded in Islamic commercial law. Employing a qualitative normative–conceptual research design, the study adopts the analytical perspectives of fiqh al-muʿāmalāt and Islamic economics. The object of the research is credit-based Islamic sales practices, analyzed through primary data derived from documented transaction practices and contracts, as well as secondary data sourced from classical and contemporary fiqh literature, Sharīʿah fatwas, and Islamic economic scholarship. The findings reveal that credit mechanisms have become the prevailing transactional model, influencing contractual relations, risk allocation, and pricing structures. This dominance tends to generate structural imbalances, particularly through disproportionate risk transfer and rigid obligations imposed on buyers, which may undermine the substantive realization of transactional justice. The study further demonstrates that excessive reliance on credit-oriented models risks marginalizing risk-sharing principles and diluting the moral objectives of Islamic economics. Normatively, the findings suggest that credit mechanisms should function as conditional instruments rather than default transactional frameworks. Practically, the study underscores the need for justice-oriented contractual designs, stronger regulatory oversight, and the promotion of alternative Sharīʿah-compliant models that better align with the objectives of Islamic economics.

References

Abdullah, A., & Chee, K. L. (2021). Risk allocation and justice in Islamic commercial contracts. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 14(4), 732–748.

https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-10-2020-0502

Amin, H., Rahman, A. R. A., & Razak, D. A. (2021). Consumer acceptance of Islamic credit products: An empirical analysis. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 12(7), 1371–1387.

https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-03-2020-0078

Asutay, M. (2021). Reconsidering Islamic economics: The normative foundations of justice. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 12(3), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-06-2020-0184

Asutay, M. (2021). Reconsidering Islamic economics: The normative foundations of justice. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 12(3), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-06-2020-0184

Asutay, M., & Harningtyas, A. F. (2019). Developing maqasid al-shariah index to evaluate Islamic economic performance. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 10(1), 123–144.

https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-03-2017-0042

Ayub, M. (2019). Risk and return principles in Islamic finance. Journal of Islamic Business and Management, 9(2), 205–221.

https://doi.org/10.26501/jibm/2019.0902-004

Chapra, M. U. (2020). Islamic economics: What it is and how it developed. Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, 33(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.4197/Islec.33-1.1

Chapra, M. U. (2021). The future of Islamic economics: Vision and challenges. Islamic Economic Studies, 29(1), 1–16.

https://doi.org/10.1108/IES-02-2021-0001

Dusuki, A. W. (2021). Revisiting the objectives of Islamic finance: From form to substance. Humanomics, 37(1), 1–15.

https://doi.org/10.1108/H-06-2020-0110

El-Gamal, M. A. (2020). Islamic finance: Law, economics, and practice. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 44(4), 823–845.

https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bez063

Farooq, M., & Alahkam, A. (2023). Debt-based financing and consumer vulnerability in Islamic markets. ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, 15(2), 210–226. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIF-08-2022-0185

Hassan, M. K., & Aliyu, S. (2019). A contemporary survey of Islamic banking literature. Journal of Financial Stability, 34, 12–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2017.11.006

Hassan, M. K., Rabbani, M. R., & Ali, M. A. (2023). Household debt and ethical challenges in Islamic finance. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 9(2), 245–268. https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v9i2.1620

Kahf, M. (2019). Islamic finance contracts and the challenge of debt domination. Journal of Islamic Economics, Banking and Finance, 15(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.12816/0051446

Kamali, M. H. (2023). Justice and fairness in Islamic commercial law. Arab Law Quarterly, 37(2), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1163/15730255-BJA10082

Kamla, R., & Haque, F. (2022). Islamic finance, social justice and ethical accountability. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 35(6), 1425–1447. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2020-4531

Khan, T. (2021). Risk-sharing and justice in Islamic finance: A normative assessment. ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, 13(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIF-05-2020-0092

Naja, S. (2025). Mindfulness Islami Alternatif Untuk Terapi Modern. NIHAYAH: Journal of Islamic Studies, 1(2), 123-141.

Nasrullah, N. (2025). Etika muslim di dunia virtual tantangan baru dalam ruang digital. NIHAYAH: Journal of Islamic Studies, 1(2), 158-173.

Nasrullah, N., & Syauky, A. (2025). Digitalisasi dan Analisis Jaringan Ilmu (Isnad) Sanad Hadis: Pemanfaatan Teknologi Digital dalam Studi Kritik Hadis. Jalalain: Journal of Qur'an and Hadith, 1(1), 17-22.

Nienhaus, V. (2020). Risk sharing and risk shifting in Islamic finance. Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, 33(2), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.4197/Islec.33-2.3

Rahman, A. A., Saiti, B., & Tohirin, A. (2022). Digital Islamic finance and ethical challenges. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 13(6), 1284–1301. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-01-2021-0029

Rahman, D. M., & Alfarizzaki, M. Z. (2025). Dari Amanah ke Keunggulan: Transformasi Nilai Islam dalam Kepemimpinan Bisnis Modern. Mukhtasab: Journal of Economics and Islamic Business, 1(1), 31-46.

Rosly, S. A. (2020). Risk transfer and Shariah compliance in Islamic contracts. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 11(6), 1327–1342. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-04-2019-0079

Siddiqi, M. N. (2022). Justice, hardship, and contractual flexibility in Islamic economics. Review of Islamic Economics, 26(1), 1–18.

https://doi.org/10.1108/RIE-03-2021-0004

Wilson, R. (2020). Islamic finance in the global economy: Constraints and opportunities. Thunderbird International Business Review, 62(3), 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.22118

Wilson, R. (2021). Moral economy and the limits of Shariah compliance. ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, 13(2), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIF-01-2021-0013

Zaman, A. (2020). Reclaiming the spiritual foundations of Islamic economics. Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, 33(2), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.4197/Islec.33-2.1

Zulkhibri, M. (2022). Fintech, digitalization and the future of Islamic finance. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 8(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v8i1.1424

Downloads

Published

2026-02-27

How to Cite

Rahma, C. D. (2026). THE DOMINANCE OF CREDIT MECHANISMS IN SHARIA TRADING AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PRINCIPLE OF TRANSACTIONAL JUSTICE. Mukhtasab: Journal of Economics and Islamic Business, 2(1), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.65802/mukhtasab.v2i1.118