Peer Review Process

Rigorous, Structured & Objective Evaluation

Every manuscript submitted to Jalalain: Journal of Qur-an and Hadith undergoes a rigorous and structured peer review process to ensure the academic quality, originality, and relevance of published articles. The journal implements a double-blind peer review system, where both reviewers and authors remain anonymous throughout the evaluation process to promote objectivity and fairness.

Initial Evaluation

Upon submission, each manuscript is first reviewed by the editorial team to verify its conformity with the journal’s focus, scope, and formatting guidelines. Manuscripts that do not meet these requirements may be returned to authors for revision or rejected before peer review.

Double-Blind Peer Review

Manuscripts passing the initial screening are sent to at least two qualified reviewers with expertise relevant to the topic. Reviewers evaluate the paper’s originality, theoretical contribution, methodological rigor, clarity, and relevance to Islamic economics and business studies.

Review Outcomes:

Accepted without revision Accepted with minor revisions Revisions required (major) Rejected

Revision Stage

Authors are required to revise their manuscripts according to reviewers’ feedback and resubmit within the specified timeframe. The revised version may be re-evaluated by the same reviewers if necessary.

Final Decision

The final decision on manuscript acceptance is made by the Editor-in-Chief based on the reviewers’ recommendations and the overall quality of the paper.

Editing and Publication

Accepted papers will undergo language editing, proofreading, and layout formatting before publication. Authors will be notified once their article is scheduled for online publication.

⏱️ Average Process Duration: 4 – 8 Weeks

JALALAIN is committed to maintaining transparency, academic integrity, and fairness throughout the review process.